Re: [Cooker] Cooker and stripping binaries

[Yoann Vandoorselaere]

Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > I think the point here is that we could not strip the debuging symbol from
> > binary for ease of 'general' debuging.
> 
> rpm -i /SRPMS/*.src.rpm, export DONT_STRIP=1 before the end of %install.

what about -O0 & -fno-inline ?

> > I want to be able to trace a bug and report it to the author.
> > Maybe it's also why cooker is there.
> 
> no it's for debugging a distribution we debug programs if give
> problems to distribution (and in this case we know how to recompile a
> src.rpm to bug report the upstream author).

The point in this thread is that it could be more simple if all
rpm on cooker where compiled with debuging / wo opts.

-- 
                -- Yoann http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~yoann/
   An engineer from NVidia, while asking him to release cards specs said :
        "Actually, we do write our drivers without documentation."