Re: [Cooker] Cooker and stripping binaries

[Thierry Vignaud]

Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I think the point here is that we could not strip the debuging symbol from
> > > binary for ease of 'general' debuging.
> > 
> > rpm -i /SRPMS/*.src.rpm, export DONT_STRIP=1 before the end of %install.
> 
> what about -O0 & -fno-inline ?

withouth DONT_STRIP, spec_helper'll still strip out debugging information.
 
> > > I want to be able to trace a bug and report it to the author.
> > > Maybe it's also why cooker is there.
> > 
> > no it's for debugging a distribution we debug programs if give
> > problems to distribution (and in this case we know how to recompile a
> > src.rpm to bug report the upstream author).
> 
> The point in this thread is that it could be more simple if all
> rpm on cooker where compiled with debuging / wo opts.

you want cooker to be on 20 cd :-)

-- 
        -- (c) tv, DUT anglais technique & gestion - administration department