On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 12:02:27AM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> It's like the story of mp3 encoders, of crypto, etc. Legalization [e.g.
> being sure of whether we can or can't include such things] is expensive,
> and sometimes some "e.g. managers" from here have to take decisions..
That is completely understood, but as a (previous) cotributor to this
package, I feel somewhat "hurd" if one of "my" packages gets dumped without
any information to at least me. Not that I want to have a say, I'm simply
not in a position to ask for something like this, but at least a mail
informing me about this would have been nice.
But why do you dump gnapster? In *MY* opininon, gnapster is one of the best
napster clients. Couldn't you have dumped some other napster clients? And
why do you still carry napster clients? This doesn't make sense.
Besides, a napster *CLIENT* is not illegal. Maybe using it is illegal in
some parts of the world, but arguably not where I live (Germany). Couldn't
you put on a German server if you feer legal actions?
Alexander Skwar
--
Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx
Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys
ICQ: 7328191
