Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 07:43:30AM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote: > > BTW, why would you bother using IDE if you wanted performance? > > A simple cost/benefit relationship. IDE is *much* cheaper than SCSI and the > fastest hard drives (as far as MB/sec is concerned) are IDE drives. False. Faster EIDE drives gives you ~40Mb/sec while edge SCSI ones deliver up to 65Mo/sec. > And with UDMA they aren't as CPU hungry as the older non-UDMA drives were. > > Why should I buy the much more expensive SCSI disks as a home user? It > simply doesn't make sense anymore, at least not for me. > > Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Meir Faraj
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Meir Faraj
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Meir Faraj
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Meir Faraj
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Francis Galiegue
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Francis Galiegue
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Alexander Skwar
- [Cooker] deplist Ray
- Re: [Cooker] deplist Nora Etukudo
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] OT - IDE Management Leon Brooks
