Alexander Skwar wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 07:16:37AM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote: >> If the swap space in use (your screenshot shows only 4MB, a trivial amount) gets >> much above your RAM size, and note that you should have allocated at least twice > Why? If he isn't even using the 128 Megs he allocated, what good should it > do to allocate >= 256 MB as you suggest? Means his system can cope gracefully with an overload (e.g. netscape loads a bad plugin and starts gobbling RAM like it's going out of fashion, 20 friends drop in on the net and test his big new CGI script all at once while he's testing video-editing software, whatever). -- A celebrity is someone who works hard all his life to become known and then wears dark glasses to avoid being recognized.
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Francis Galiegue
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Meir Faraj
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Meir Faraj
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Meir Faraj
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Thierry Vignaud
