actually they are pre 2.1 On Wednesday 06 December 2000 22:22, you wrote: > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 22:03, Zeljko Vukman wrote: > > On Thursday 07 December 2000 02:51, Steve Wray wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote: > > > > > Is there an official set of RPMS for upgrading to KDE 2.0.1. This > > > > > is a BUG FIX release so I think it is important that current users > > > > > of Mandrake 7.2 be able to upgrade perhaps even with the mandrake > > > > > update facility. > > Should have waited. It is being worked on. > > BTW all those downloading from nebsllc.com , those are not 2.0.1 they are > from the HEAD cvs path. When you "upgrade" to 2.0.1 you will loose > features. > > look at the source dates. They are from before 2.0.1 was announced. Sorry. > > -Chris
- [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update? Daniel Tabuenca
- Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Update... Zeljko Vukman
- RE: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Up... Steve Wray
- Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.... salane
- Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.... Zeljko Vukman
- RE: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE ... Steve Wray
- Re: [Cooker] Why no Official... Vadim Plessky
- Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE ... Christopher Molnar
- Re: [Cooker] Why no Official... salane
- Re: [Cooker] Why no Official... Vadim Plessky
- Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE ... Vadim Plessky
- Re[2]: [Cooker] Why no Offic... Brook Humphrey
- Re: [Cooker] Why no Official... mdk mailin list (Harry)
- Re: [Cooker] Why no Official... Arnold Troeger
- Re: [Cooker] Why no Offi... Vadim Plessky
- Re: [Cooker] Why no Offi... SHadowX
- Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.1 Up... Daniel Tabuenca
- Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE 2.0.... Zeljko Vukman
- Re: [Cooker] Why no Official KDE ... Christopher Molnar
