Hello Vadim,

I would be interested in the qt packages for i686.

Thursday, December 07, 2000, 3:15:54 AM, you wrote:

Vadim Plessky>  7 ??????? 2000 06:03, Zeljko Vukman ???????:
Vadim Plessky> |   On Thursday 07 December 2000 02:51, Steve Wray wrote:
|   >> > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 15:26, Daniel Tabuenca wrote:
|   >> > > Is there an official set of RPMS for upgrading to KDE 2.0.1. This
|   >> > > is a BUG FIX release so I think it is important that current users
|   >> > > of Mandrake 7.2 be able to upgrade perhaps even with the mandrake
|   >> > > update facility.
|   >> >
|   >> > You are dreaming. Mandrake has no plans to make RPMS of Kde2.0.1
|   >> > for Mandrake
|   >> > 7.2. The only available 2.0.1 will be on Cooker (which is BTW binary
|   >> > incompatible with 7.2). Compile yourself.
|   >>
|   >> I am not sourcecode! I am a free man!
|   >> Pity this doesn't go to alt.humor.best-of-usenet...
|   >> Sorry but I really couldn't resist that
|   >> (to tell the truth I didn't even try)
Vadim Plessky> |
Vadim Plessky> |   You will compile yourself when you choose to compile Kde2.0.1.
Vadim Plessky> |   He, he..
Vadim Plessky> |   Now I must be serious. Mandrake Comp. said that no final Kde-2.0.1 
will
Vadim Plessky> | be available for users of Mandrake 7.2.
Vadim Plessky> |   I compiled myself when I had to compile final Kde-2.0.1. It took 24
Vadim Plessky> | hours. I was totally compiled after that experience.

Vadim Plessky> Do you have now binary RPMs (or compiled from tar.gz)?
Vadim Plessky> If you have binary RPMs for LM 7.2, may be, we can make them public on 
some 
Vadim Plessky> ftp server?
Vadim Plessky> Finally, we can put them on RPMFIND.net, why not?  Just mark them as 
Vadim Plessky> "Builder: LM Fan Club; Distribution: Linux Mandrake 7.2"

Vadim Plessky> As I already said, it's much better to use KDE 2.1 ... when it's 
available, 
Vadim Plessky> and not to use KDE 2.0.1. Unfortunately, KDE 2.1 is not in Release 
condition 
Vadim Plessky> yet.

Vadim Plessky> P.S. I have working QT 2.2.2 binary rpms for LM 7.2, and (god!) it is 
i686 
Vadim Plessky> built. (not  *default* i586)
Vadim Plessky> If somebody is interested - let me know.  Binary has bigger size then 
RPMs 
Vadim Plessky> created by Chris. /don't know why; if you know why - let me know ;-/

Vadim Plessky> I can built i586 binary as well, if there is an interest. It just 35 
minutes 
Vadim Plessky> on my Pentium III box.
Vadim Plessky> To my mind, you should update to QT 2.2.2 even if you use KDE 2.0 
Release 
Vadim Plessky> from LM 7.2.  And, QT 2.2.3 is very close...
 


-- 
Best regards,
 Brook                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_____NetZero Free Internet Access and Email______
   http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html

Reply via email to