"J . A . Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2001.01.22 Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > Okay, after all these complaints :-), I've modified the behaviour: the
> > field is here, if you leave it blank I will use autodetection, else I will
> > take your input.
> >
>
> A suggestion: I think it is more user-friendly to fill in the default value
> and let the user change it.
I think I won't make the callback for such a limited usage.
I don't see your point; why do you need the default value if this is to
change it..
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
