On 24 Mar 2001 18:59:48 +0100, Pixel wrote: > swap size should be mainly based on how the box is used, not on how many ram > you have. On a desktop, you don't need much swap... except if you don't have > many memory, just the opposite as the rule 2*memsize. It's more like > swapsize = 300MB - swapsize. > > diskdrake doesn't take the ramsize into account and will never do! > That's cool. I had always wondered what "the rule" was or if there was one at all. I know in WinNT the rule is swap should be physical+11MB (the 11 MB being for debugging info if (when) the system crashes, I think). I didn't know if Linux has similar rules. Is there a HOWTO on this subject? Eaon
- [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? James, Rick
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? Michael Brown
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? Eaon
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap spa... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap spa... diego
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap spa... Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap... Greg A. Bur
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? Peter Ruskin
- RE: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? Marcel Pol
