I've done that before and it gave me a 243M swap partition. I only have 96M of ram. On 24 Mar 2001 10:50:03 -0700, Eaon wrote: > Arnd, > > That certainly is interesting, I hadn't heard that before (that swap > should be 2*physical). What are the implications of having a swap less > than 2*physical? You say it's "very bad", could you elaborate? > > I ask because during the installation process of cooker, I let it > automagically select my partition sizes (just cause I wanted to see if > it worked :-) ), and it made a swap partion exactly equal to my > physical ram (actually a little less. 256 MB physical, 243 MB swap). > If it is supposed to be 2*physical, then shouldn't the installer be > changed to work that way? > > Eaon >
- [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? James, Rick
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? Michael Brown
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? Eaon
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap spa... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap spa... diego
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap spa... Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap... Greg A. Bur
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? Peter Ruskin
- RE: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? Marcel Pol
