On 21 Jul 2001 17:58:02 -0400, Blue Lizard wrote:
> Well, for one thing, he lists contribs programs.
I'm never sure whether or not to include Contrib programs. What is
included within the distribution under one release sometimes becomes a
contrib in another. For instance, KMag was included in the 7.2 release,
but is a contrib in 8.0.
In any event, I think an effort should be made to make sure that the
contribs get placed into the same groups as their distribution
counterparts. Some people may prefer the contribs more (I prefer Kmag
over xmag, and LinNeighborhood over Gnomba).
> Should ghostview be under publishing under office and not applications?
> After all, most of the items under the global menu ARE applications,
> aren't they? Is this all just left over from an old redhat spawn-off?
> Let the ergonomics team consider it, that's what they are there for?
Ghostview is a good example. "Gv", "ggv", and "KGhostview" are listed
under "Applications - Publishing" while "Acroread" and "Xpdf" are listed
under "Office."
RSS
