S N wrote:
 >
Creative thoughts, but I feel a little uncomfortable with it.  In fact, 
the other day (yesterday) I was pondering a distro that wasnt a distro. 
  Just a platform, and a base off which to install stuff from other 
sources.  Was pondering the way ximian's stuff worked, was studying 
various models.  Not too sure I liked it.  For one, two windozey.  It 
just cant hold together like the integrated 'distribution of 
applications'.  two, with the way just about everything in the linux 
world is still -devel if it is any good, and just the way...well, ya 
ever notice how you cant seem to upgrade one app without upgrading all 
the others?  see, i suppose that this concept is for an all static 
distribution (if there are any stampede developers listening that 
remember this discussion we had at the last few meetings).  Because like 
windoze where it dont matter the other apps because every app will use 
its own libraries, even if 30 other apps use em.  And nothing ever 
changes.  noone ever upgrades just because of the way it is, not free, 
closed source, and thus not widely available in the matter that linux 
proggies are.  But no, this is not the way to go.  not for mandrake. 
not yet.  Cuz where i was goin earlier, with the rapid pace of 
development, one couldnt upgrade one app.  it wouldnt work.  so we have 
distros, distros like 80 and distros like cooker and the user need not 
worry about it.  Just *DONT* LIKE IT!  So anyway...
But this idea you (sn) have...nasty.  Many holes in that idea (many many 
many) that would have to be shored up before even a first attempt.  And 
it would require vast amounts of resources taken from mandrake to this 
new concept while mdk was still in production just to develop and test 
it.  takes years my boy.  it would ruin the distro because of the strain 
on resources.  bad b-ad b-a-d B-a-d BAD! BAD! BAD! BAD!
I wanna throw a tantrum over here...
-Blue



Reply via email to