Gr�goire Colbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A small standard install would be a step in the good direction, wouldn't it? for info, nearly all installs i make are small one so that reproducing/debugging install is fast. the pb is not to provide it. The pb is "isn't it too powerful?". There's is already 2 simple ways to have minimal install: - unselect XFree86-libs - load from floppy an empty file
- RE: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Install]... Blue Lizard
- Re: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Install]... Terrible Tom
- RE: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Inst... Chris Edwards
- Re: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Install] Why ... Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Install] Why "Li... Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Install] Why &quo... Gr�goire Colbert
- Re: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Install] Why ... Thierry Vignaud
- RE: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Install]... Borsenkow Andrej
- Re: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Install] Why ... Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Install] Why ... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Install]... Blue Lizard
- Re: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Inst... Terrible Tom
- Re: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Inst... Blue Lizard
- Re: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Install]... Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Install] Why "Li... Terrible Tom
- Re: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Install] Why "Li... Gr�goire Colbert
- Re: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Install] Why "Linux sucks... Terrible Tom
- RE: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Install] Why "Linux sucks... michael
- Re: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Install] Why "Linux sucks... Marco Wesselgren
- Re: [Cooker] [Holy Minimal Install] Why "Linux ... Geoffrey Lee
