On 02 Dec 2001 02:31:11 -0800 Anton Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2001-12-02 at 01:38, Marcel Pol wrote: > > On 02 Dec 2001 00:09:25 -0600 > > Lance Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I "successfully" upgraded my LM80 box from 2.2.1 to 2.2.2 using > > > binaries from cooker, but all the icons disappeared. > <snip> > > Cooker and mdk8.0 or mdk8.1 are not the same distro. > > The libpng packags are different, and that's only the start. > > If you want to run Cooker, then run Cooker. > <snip> > > The cooker "snobbery" that has developed on this list in the past 12 > months (and more dramatically in the last six) is rather disheartening. > Yes, cooker is an unstable (sometimes unusable) distribution. Yes, it > is intended primarily for use by those who Know What They Are Doing > (tm). But this is really going too far in discouraging > upgrades/testing. I didn't mean to be rude or something. Sorry if you received it like that. What happens when you run konqueror from an xterm? I expect that there are problems with libpng. Which versions of libpng do you have installed? -- Marcel Pol [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux 2.4.13-8mdksmp, up 13 days 21:23
