Denis Moreaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It may be useful to keep some libSDL 1.1 packages (and libSDL 1.0 ?) as > compat lib for some applications. > > For example, raptor (http://www.mking.com) requires libSDL 1.1 to be > played (libSDL 1.2 don't works, raptors exists with a missing lib > message).
This is (probably) because Raptor doesn't come with source but only with binary. We don't give much importance in supporting proprietary software of that kind. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
