On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 12:30:20AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > > You need to know how many time we spend reading mail,
Oh, I know. I am on Cooker as well as a few other lists. > think that an > answer like this took around 1/2 minutes at least, and that sums at > the end of the day. Indeed. But this is even more verbose that I was proposing. I was proposing a simple: Got your report, working on it. (Well if indeed you are working on it. :-) That shouldn't take even half a minute. > I try to answer things, but it is very difficult, I know. > see the ammount of > traffic that has cooker, Indeed! I have been for some time now, wondering whether Cooker needs to split into some more specific groups. For instance, I don't really need, or care to see messages about KDE as I don't use it here, but I do use Gnome so I would like to see messages about that. Maybe initially the split could go: cooker-kde cooker-gnome cooker-misc and further splits of cooker-misc if that does not bring traffic down enough. > and developers at Mandrake are in other lists > that have more traffic than this :((( I know. I know. Me too. :-) > Some times I feel bad when I am answering mails that was written 15 > days ago :(( Don't, late is better than never. :-) b. -- Brian J. Murrell
msg57586/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
