On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 10:34, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 12:30:20AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > > > Indeed. But this is even more verbose that I was proposing. I was > proposing a simple: > > Got your report, working on it. > That's be smooth indeed. > > see the ammount of > > traffic that has cooker, > > Indeed! I have been for some time now, wondering whether Cooker needs > to split into some more specific groups. For instance, I don't really > need, or care to see messages about KDE as I don't use it here, but I > do use Gnome so I would like to see messages about that. > > Maybe initially the split could go: > > cooker-kde > cooker-gnome > cooker-misc > > and further splits of cooker-misc if that does not bring traffic down > enough. >
A list per rpm (or small groups) and a front end, web based or local, that would allow to select the packages one wants to hear about? hmmm... maybe a way to generate a filter using rpm -qa? =--= kk1
