> > This is all very well; however, should not chkconfig list basesystem as > one of its dependencies, then (it does not)? >
basesystem is assumed to be always installed so this is strictly speaking redundant.
> > This is all very well; however, should not chkconfig list basesystem as > one of its dependencies, then (it does not)? >
basesystem is assumed to be always installed so this is strictly speaking redundant.