� ���, 08.06.2002, � 20:11, Juan Quintela �������: > >>>>> "borsenkow" == Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > borsenkow> I believe at some point we had kdb support now it is disabled. > borsenkow> I guess having kdb in kernel for cooker is not as bad idea, it gives you > borsenkow> some more chances to (try to) debug. It could be disabled in release > borsenkow> kernel of course. > > Humm, only real problem is on kernel-BOOT, for the rest can be used > (there are size diffs, but we can live with that for cooker kernels). > Problem is that using kdb & gdb at the same time is very slow, and I > think that there are more people using gdb than kdb (with kdb enable, > breakpoints take a lot of time each one). >
I meant situation when your system just hangs and you can't work at all. In this case there is small chance that PAUSE will give you some tool that still works. > What does people think about enabling kdb here? > What I actually miss is the ability to create dump that can be analyzed later. Juan, what do you think about Linux Crash Dump project? -andrej
