>>>>> "borsenkow" == Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
borsenkow> В Сбт, 08.06.2002, в 20:11, Juan Quintela написал: >> >>>>> "borsenkow" == Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> borsenkow> I believe at some point we had kdb support now it is disabled. borsenkow> I guess having kdb in kernel for cooker is not as bad idea, it gives you borsenkow> some more chances to (try to) debug. It could be disabled in release borsenkow> kernel of course. >> >> Humm, only real problem is on kernel-BOOT, for the rest can be used >> (there are size diffs, but we can live with that for cooker kernels). >> Problem is that using kdb & gdb at the same time is very slow, and I >> think that there are more people using gdb than kdb (with kdb enable, >> breakpoints take a lot of time each one). >> borsenkow> I meant situation when your system just hangs and you can't work at all. borsenkow> In this case there is small chance that PAUSE will give you some tool borsenkow> that still works. >> What does people think about enabling kdb here? >> borsenkow> What I actually miss is the ability to create dump that can be analyzed borsenkow> later. Juan, what do you think about Linux Crash Dump project? Last time that I looked it was _way_ intrusive in the rest of the system. Later, Juan. -- In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they are different -- Larry McVoy
