On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 04:17, Leon Brooks wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:56, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> > Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> So, I think it would be feasible (depeding on how easily Bugzilla
> >> can be hacked to do this) to have at least one non-mandrakesoft
> >> bug-triager per package, who would be able to answer the easy
> >> questions (fixed in -Xmdk, known bug in original package, fix in
> >> progress etc), thus removing a lot of the noise from the list.
>
> > that's quite an nice idea
>
> Mandrake Valued Professionals? (-:
>
> Or just Rueben's Angels? As in the `I have hired thee with my son's mandrakes'
> occasion in Genesis chapter 30. (-:
>
> Each package would have two owners, the Mandrake employee and their lay
> adoptee. Would it be feasible to tuck that away in the RPMs somewhere so it
> could be found by Cooker denizens but not widely advertised (e.g. doesn't pop
> out in rpm -qi) for the Mandrake-using public at large?
>
> Cheers; Leon
>
>
I would think that modifying rpmmon is what your thinking of. Running
'rpmmon.pl -p <package> could show the mandrakesoft maintainer and bug
triager
--
/curtis ><>
Mandrake Linux 9.0 (cooker)
Kernel Version 2.4.18-22w4l
Uptime 18 days 0 hours 5 minutes
