Vincent Danen wrote:
Yup... likewise. But I have KDE installed on my desktop machines (for testing, etc.) but I don't usually use it. Which is why I asked.. I've never tried to run a QT app without having KDE installed, so I wasn't sure. Actually, I don't think there are really any QT apps that I run.There aren't many standalone QT apps. I am not sure why as I haven't done enough development of either QT or KDE to know. Most GTK apps I have tried don't need GNOME, I'm not sure why this is either (even though I have done quite a bit of GTK development), but I'm happy about it either way.
Has nothing to do with your preferences, or only to do with your preferences. =)I am just concerned about desktop integration (the look of the dektop as a whole). Even if we ignore QT completely for a second, we can point to how GTK 1 apps are starting to look out of place around GTK 2 apps.
Personally, I think there are much more important things to do than this... this seems to have no value other than for it to be QT vs. GTK. <shrug> I would, personally, put it very low on any priority list.
Again, it's probably a fact that they look different, but an opinion as to how much any person really cares about this.
--
Sincerely,
David Walluck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
msg79461/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
