--- Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, the other point is that a GTK->Qt port of the > draktools is really of > no benefit, unless the can be integrated with KDE > (ie embedded in KDE > Control Center). > > Otherwise, you can achieve more or less the same > thing by ensuring that > there are consitent GTk/Qt themes so that you > wouldn't notice the > difference. This would be easeir, and of greater > value. > > And, non-KDE stuff can already be embedded in KDE > Control Center, so I > *really* see no benefit.
For the third time people, there are benefits to it. The fact that the bindings are automated now is a huge one. > So, before one has a poll, one needs to ensure that > the proposals are > understood. Obviously! > A Qt port wouldn't mean better KDE > integration (besides style, true > colours etc). Better KDE integration would come at > the cost of requiring > 50 > MB of KDE libraries on machines that could possibly > only have had 300MB of > software installed otherwise (and still have a > working contrl center). false __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
