Igor Izyumin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Friday 18 October 2002 07:27 am, David Walluck wrote: > > Buchan Milne wrote: > > > David Walluck wrote: > > >> 1.) xfs support (with no ext2 /boot parition). I just reported this > > >> recently, and have reported it ever since xfs support went in versions > > >> ago. > > > > > > The issue isn't where your boot partition is (AFAIK), it's where LILO is > > > installed to (not necessarily the same thinge). Last time I tried XFS on > > > root there was a warning. > > > > LILO is on the MBR, not the disk partition itself. GRUB doesn't have > > luck either. > > She was installing Lilo on the partition itself, because she had another > bootloader on the MBR.
Ah i didn't understand what this was all about. I forgot about this pb. I'm not much used to people installing on partition instead of MBR. > There definitely should be some sort of a warning if > you don't create and ext2/3 partition. Oh my... It works nicely for anything else than XFS. And even, this *** ***** **** *** eugenia could have installed it on the swap partition! (not tested, but AFAIK it should work!)
