--- Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 05:14, David Walser wrote: > > > Really, I understand all of our tendencies to get > > emotional, but I honestly hoped to start a > technical > > discussion. Someone is trying to change policy > behind > > our backs, I think it's a stupid change, and I'm > > trying to get a discussion out in the open. > > Uh, in what way is submitting a new package with the > change in the log, > and elaborating on the change when asked about it, > doing anything > "behind our backs"?
Well, given it's one of the huge things that RH got criticized for with 8.0, it was obviously going to be a controversial thing, and it probably should have been discussed before the fact, rather than, it's done, haha now you suckas have to live with it! Otherwise, yeah, hallelujah for the changelog list :o) This goes back to Warly's question of what needs to be improved in the development process, and openness could be even better. It seems some changes are just mandated to the developers we interact with from somewhere above, and they just seem to come from out of nowhere, with no discussion. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
