Le Jeudi 14 Novembre 2002 10:23, Luca Olivetti a �crit : > Olivier Thauvin wrote: > > Le Jeudi 14 Novembre 2002 09:20, Stefan van der Eijk a �crit : > >>The rpm package is the victim of itself, lol! > >> > >>Stefan > >> > >>RPM build errors: > >> Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > >> /usr/include/beecrypt/base64.h > > > > I like this feature I think it was missing, but a warning would be better > > to begin than an error... lot of package will failed on rebuild. :) > > I don't agree: I suppose that mandrakesoft has an automated build > procedure, a warning will probably go unnoticed, while a package that > fails to build will surely get a maintaner attention. The result will be > many less broken packages (I hope).
Hoo, think to poeple who rebuild about 2000 packages for ppc or alpha, who have already to fix lot of packager error about arch specific pb... who have already to deal with reject upload. Try to start an automatic rebuild for all cooker for i686, and think you should have all packages for this arch, you will understand what I am saying... > > Bye -- Linux pour Mac !? Enfin le moyen de transformer une pomme en v�ritable ordinateur. - JL. Olivier Thauvin - http://nanardon.homelinux.org/
