Re: [Cooker] rpm-4.0.4-20mdk: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s)found:

[Luca Olivetti]

Han Boetes wrote:

The real problem anyway is that the rpm spec file is too complex and error prone.

    _---________---__________
   |                         }
  /    DO NOT FEED THE TROLL \

Here's an example spec file for python in another packaging system. I don't particularly like the syntax, but if you can tell with a straight face that the corresponding rpm spec file is simpler, don't know who's trolling here

W Python Interpreter - An attempt to be better than PERL
S http://www.python.org/ftp/python/{V}/{PV}.tgz
H http://www.python.org
A LICENSE PSF-2.2
R BUILD c-build
R BUILD zlib
R BUILD {READLINE}
R BUILD {READLINE?"ncurses"}
R BUILD {BERKDB}
R BUILD {TCLTK}
R BUILD expat
E <C @Makefile.pre.in s:install-platlib.*:& --install-scripts=$(BINDIR):
A CONFOPT --with-fpectl OPT="{CFLAGS}"


--
Luca Olivetti
Note.- This message reached you today, it may not tomorrow if you
are using MAPS services. They arbitrarily include in their lists
IP addresses not related in any way to spam, and in so doing are
disrupting Internet connectivity. Please stop supporting them.
See http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/05/21/1944247