Luca Olivetti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Olivier Thauvin wrote:
>
> >>fails to build will surely get a maintaner attention. The result will be
> >>many less broken packages (I hope).
> >
> >
> >Hoo, think to poeple who rebuild about 2000 packages for ppc or alpha, who
> >have already to fix lot of packager error about arch specific pb... who
> >have already to deal with reject upload. Try to start an automatic rebuild
> >for all cooker for i686, and think you should have all packages for this
> >arch, you will understand what I am saying...
>
> yes, I understand, it will be a PITA to fix those packages, but it is
> worse to leave them unchanged and non working because of some missing file.
> The real problem anyway is that the rpm spec file is too complex and
> error prone.
_---________---__________
| }
/ DO NOT FEED THE TROLL \
\____ __/
-------------------`
|#:|
|#:|
|#:|
\\\|#:|/ /
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
//Han
--
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
