Olivier Thauvin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > We could later on let them "patch" the macros with something like:
> >
> > #!/bin/sh
> > if [ -z "`grep _Xprefix /usr/lib/rpm/macros`" ]; then
> > cat <<EOF>>/usr/lib/rpm/macros
> >
> > %{_Xprefix} /usr/X11R6
> > blahblahblah
> > blah
> > EOF
> > else
> > echo "Your macros already seem to be patched" >&2
> > fi
>
>
> I don't like this kind of hidden patch. Sound like M$ patch as
> office97 for Win95 that fix the kernel.No you don't get it. Must be the english part ;). ``let them'' means something like: If they report that an srpm does not build anymore we can tell them (in a faq or something) to add those lines to their macros file or run "this" script that does it for them. There is nothing hidden about that. //Han -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
