Han Boetes wrote:
Per �yvind Karlsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Han Boetes wrote:I think it's a good idea:)
I wanted to suggest the addition of a few macros inYes, could be a good idea, but rebuilding for older distro won't be
/usr/lib/rpm/macros for X packages: Patch included.
compatible unless we provide updated macros there too. I have been
using %x11prefix in XFree86 package actually.
BTW, %_Xlibdir is wrong on lib64 arches.
AOL-er ;)
hehe, but you stole it from me;)
hmm, that one looks dirty, if it should modify a static file like that, it should rather be done via an rpm upgrade
rebuilding for older distro's would'nt be any more problem than just
adding those macro's to the .spec file, would it?
We could keep the macro's in the spec for at least until 9.1 is relea- sed. I mean people that want to rebuild srpms on 9.0 or 8.2 usually know what they are doing and I wouldn't want to break that. We could later on let them "patch" the macros with something like: #!/bin/sh if [ -z "`grep _Xprefix /usr/lib/rpm/macros`" ]; then cat <<EOF>>/usr/lib/rpm/macros %{_Xprefix} /usr/X11R6 blahblahblah blah EOF else echo "Your macros already seem to be patched" >&2 fi
(or did I misunderstand?)
ahh, btw. people, I FINALLY QUIT MY JOB! mehaa:)Concratulations :)
//Han
-- Regards, Per �yvind Karlsen Sintrax Solutions www.sintrax.net - +47 41681061
