Hi,
reading a slew of invalid bug reports for Mandrake Linux 9.0 and so on,
I understand that this Bugzilla is for current Cooker only.
1. The question is, why there are product version dating way back? for
example, for mozilla package, there is a version 0.9.8 (!). I think this
contributes to point 3.
2. The navigation is less than perfect. Could you consider adding a
standard footer as seen on bugzilla.mozilla.org or bugzilla.gnome.org?
Specifically, I would like to see whether I am logged in, quick links to
My bugs, predefined queries, etc.
3. Slowness... Any hints why would that be? I am actively using both
bugzilla.mozilla.org or bugzilla.gnome.org, as well as some local
installations at companies I worked for, and all of them were reasonably
fast. Perhaps https contributes to the problem? Huge number of packages?
How about creating a meta system (i.e. GNOME-2, KDE-3, Apache), covering
all packages related to that area?
4. qa.mandrakesoft.com, IMHO opinion, looks like Q&A for a stable
product, hence the possible confusion and reports for MDK 9.0 bugs. What
is Q&A, anyway? "Questions and answers"? "Quality assurance"? Perhaps
you could consider moving this to cooker.mandrakesoft.com.
Anyway, thanks for Bugzilla. Way better than mailing-list/archives only
problem reporting and follow-up confusion.
Michal
- Re: [Cooker] QA Bugzilla questions Michal Bukovjan
- Re: [Cooker] QA Bugzilla questions Ben Reser
- Re: [Cooker] QA Bugzilla questions Warly
- Re: [Cooker] QA Bugzilla questions Ben Reser
