On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 05:34:36PM +0100, Michal Bukovjan wrote: > reading a slew of invalid bug reports for Mandrake Linux 9.0 and so on, > I understand that this Bugzilla is for current Cooker only. > > 1. The question is, why there are product version dating way back? for > example, for mozilla package, there is a version 0.9.8 (!). I think this > contributes to point 3.
I've been wondering the same thing... > 2. The navigation is less than perfect. Could you consider adding a > standard footer as seen on bugzilla.mozilla.org or bugzilla.gnome.org? > Specifically, I would like to see whether I am logged in, quick links to > My bugs, predefined queries, etc. I keep looking for this too. > 3. Slowness... Any hints why would that be? I am actively using both > bugzilla.mozilla.org or bugzilla.gnome.org, as well as some local > installations at companies I worked for, and all of them were reasonably > fast. Perhaps https contributes to the problem? Huge number of packages? > How about creating a meta system (i.e. GNOME-2, KDE-3, Apache), covering > all packages related to that area? Probably because it's hosted in Paris and their connection is less than stellar. > 4. qa.mandrakesoft.com, IMHO opinion, looks like Q&A for a stable > product, hence the possible confusion and reports for MDK 9.0 bugs. What > is Q&A, anyway? "Questions and answers"? "Quality assurance"? Perhaps > you could consider moving this to cooker.mandrakesoft.com. Or cookerbugs.mandrakesoft.com... -- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ben.reser.org "If you're not making any mistakes, you're flat out not trying hard enough." - Jim Nichols
