Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 05:34:36PM +0100, Michal Bukovjan wrote:
>> reading a slew of invalid bug reports for Mandrake Linux 9.0 and so on, 
>> I understand that this Bugzilla is for current Cooker only.
>> 
>> 1. The question is, why there are product version dating way back? for 
>> example, for mozilla package, there is a version 0.9.8 (!). I think this 
>> contributes to point 3.
>
> I've been wondering the same thing...

Yes, you are right, old version should be removed after some time. At
present the version must be 6 months or one year back in the past, I do
not remember exactly, but I could change it to 2 or 3 months.

>> 2. The navigation is less than perfect. Could you consider adding a 
>> standard footer as seen on bugzilla.mozilla.org or bugzilla.gnome.org? 
>> Specifically, I would like to see whether I am logged in, quick links to 
>> My bugs, predefined queries, etc.
>
> I keep looking for this too.

I will try to add it.

>> 3. Slowness... Any hints why would that be? I am actively using both 
>> bugzilla.mozilla.org or bugzilla.gnome.org, as well as some local 
>> installations at companies I worked for, and all of them were reasonably 
>> fast. Perhaps https contributes to the problem? Huge number of packages? 
>> How about creating a meta system (i.e. GNOME-2, KDE-3, Apache), covering 
>> all packages related to that area?
>
> Probably because it's hosted in Paris and their connection is less than
> stellar.

Yes several reasons make it slow. The number of packages, the paris
hosting, and the not so powerfull computer where it is hosted. I
will try to address those points (at least as most as I can).

>> 4. qa.mandrakesoft.com, IMHO opinion, looks like Q&A for a stable 
>> product, hence the possible confusion and reports for MDK 9.0 bugs. What 
>> is Q&A, anyway? "Questions and answers"? "Quality assurance"? Perhaps 
>> you could consider moving this to cooker.mandrakesoft.com.
>
> Or cookerbugs.mandrakesoft.com...

Yes it could be renamed, however this is not a major issue for me.

-- 
Warly

Reply via email to