On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:23:48 +0100, Warly wrote: > Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 04:50:35PM +0100, Warly wrote: >>> As a consequence, I will try: >>> >>> - to fix the duplicate problem so that anyone could reply to a bug in >>> cooker without caring of the address is responding to. Bugzilla will >>> takes care not to send duplicates. >>> >>> - to make it clearer on bugzilla that it is only for development >>> version. And also to do an automatic search before the bug is posted to >>> ask user if by chance his bug is not already reported. >> >> So you're not splitting the lists then? > > I will not split it immediately, at least. If this really does not work as > this, the list will be splitted.
I think splitting the list is a really bad idea.. The main idea of putting bugzilla reports on cooker was to ensure all cooker folks would be able to help us to triage bugzilla, since it is extremely difficult to do it when you are a maintainer (the same is true for all bugzilla around, GNOME or Mozilla..).. If we put the bugs report from bugzilla on other mailing list, a lot of cooker people will not read them and therefore will not be able to help in triaging those bugs.. I remind everybody that cooker is a development (read unstable) distro that bugzilla is here to help to stabilize it.. -- Frederic Crozat MandrakeSoft
