See I'm all for having a seperation of bugzilla and cooker lists, only because there are interesting cooker discussions that occur, however I do not care to see all the little status updates for every bugzilla entry. If this form of seperation were posible, sending only the introductory bug report to cooker, then all subsequent entries to a bugzilla list it would be fantastic.
Gizmo On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 19:03, Ben Reser wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 02:41:13PM -0800, David Walser wrote: > > I suppose that would work, although it'd be a lot more > > work adding yourself to CC's all the time. It might > > be easier if the headers got set so that when you > > reply to one of those bugzilla e-mails it goes to the > > bug instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I'm glad > > someone explained why we were getting duplicate mails). > > If you're following all bugs you'd just subscribe to the bugs list. > If you're only following a few here and there it'd be better... less > noise to filter through. So yeah you'd have to spend some time adding > yourself to those bugs but the time not spent deleting stuff you didn't > care about would make up for it. > > As far as the headers, they are set to when you reply to a bug it goes > to the bug. Some people are doing reply to all, rather than just using > the reply to list or reply (reply to list will use the reply-to header > which will make it go back to the bug). -- Nelson Bartley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
