On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, andre wrote:

> On Friday 10 January 2003 20:29, Gerard Patel wrote:
> > At 12:01 PM 1/10/03 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> > My guess is that Mandrake switched to Shorewall because
> > the config files are way easier to change by program.
> > Also Bastille is doing additionnal security that could conflict
> > with other Mandrake software, while Shorewall does only
> > one thing, network.
>
> Can be true but there was no program to change the config files

drakfw does, it just isn't powerful enough for a machine doing ICS, it's
fine for a standard dialup though.

> You didn't need to read the help files to make it work, with shorewall you did
> need to read them which is not good enough for a firewall config program
> because if i wanted to do it good i wouldn't use shorewall

In other words, the problem is not shoreall, but drakfw. PLEASE BE
SPECIFIC. It's impossible to fix bugs if people use the wrong descriptio
for the problem.

>
> It may have worked if internet was on eth0 but if it wasn't it didn't work.
>

Did you file a bug?

-- 
|----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------|
Buchan Milne                Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work            +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering         http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key                   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7


Reply via email to