rcc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd suggest making the installer more intelligent at selection/space > computation. There's no reason to stick to $min_mark = 4 when there's > plenty of space available. I don't know if that's still the case as I've > bumped all 3s to 4s in rpmsrate when the problem first showed. Now I > have my original defaults back.
i'm not against changing things... but please tell me which one.
