Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > rcc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'd suggest making the installer more intelligent at selection/space > > computation. There's no reason to stick to $min_mark = 4 when there's > > plenty of space available. I don't know if that's still the case as I've > > bumped all 3s to 4s in rpmsrate when the problem first showed. Now I > > have my original defaults back. > > i'm not against changing things... but please tell me which one.
i think it's not too good to install too many packages even if we have diskspace: - installation time will increase much -> bad look at mandrake install for people and testers/reviewers - people will have more different install scenarios, so more odd things can happen - rpmdrake should be easy enough to select additional packages, after installation and after all that's more or less what we had before (we could select how much package we wanted with a slider), is it really good to revert to that kind of thing? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
