On Wednesday 12 February 2003 12:19, G�tz Waschk wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 12:07:49 Uhr MET, schrieb John Allen:
> > On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:28, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> > > David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > I don't seem to have those in Mandrake :o(
> > >
> > > we do have man sex
> >
> > And it would be nice if it were removed. I have children using Mandrake
> > and would be apalled it they view the "sex" man page.
>
> Let me guess: you are a catholic?
Nope. Try again
But in all honesty whay the fuck does it matter.
I have a 9 year old girl and I don't want her reading shite like this. Its not
fucking necessary, and has no bleedin bollockin functionality, its not even
fucking funny for fuck sake.
-1 masturbate
-a external stimulus (aphrodisiac) option
-b buggery
-B<animal>
bestiality with <animal>
-c chocolate sauce option
-C chaining option (cuffs included) (see also -m -s -W)
-d<file>
get a date with the features described in <file>
-e exhibitionism (image sent to all machines on the net)
-f foreplay option
-F nasal sex with plants
-i coitus interruptus (messy!)
-j jacuzzi option (California sites only)
-l leather option
-m masochism (see -s)
-M triple parallel (Menage a Trois) option
-n necrophilia (if target process is not dead, program kills it)
-o oral option
-O parallel access (orgy)
--
John Allen, Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
