On Wednesday 12 February 2003 12:19, Götz Waschk wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003, 12:07:49 Uhr MET, schrieb John Allen: > > On Wednesday 12 February 2003 11:28, Thierry Vignaud wrote: > > > David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I don't seem to have those in Mandrake :o( > > > > > > we do have man sex > > > > And it would be nice if it were removed. I have children using Mandrake > > and would be apalled it they view the "sex" man page. > > Let me guess: you are a catholic?
Nope. Try again But in all honesty whay the fuck does it matter. I have a 9 year old girl and I don't want her reading shite like this. Its not fucking necessary, and has no bleedin bollockin functionality, its not even fucking funny for fuck sake. -1 masturbate -a external stimulus (aphrodisiac) option -b buggery -B<animal> bestiality with <animal> -c chocolate sauce option -C chaining option (cuffs included) (see also -m -s -W) -d<file> get a date with the features described in <file> -e exhibitionism (image sent to all machines on the net) -f foreplay option -F nasal sex with plants -i coitus interruptus (messy!) -j jacuzzi option (California sites only) -l leather option -m masochism (see -s) -M triple parallel (Menage a Trois) option -n necrophilia (if target process is not dead, program kills it) -o oral option -O parallel access (orgy) -- John Allen, Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]