On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 10:09, Brook Humphrey wrote: > On Wednesday 19 February 2003 09:22 am, Buchan Milne wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Brook Humphrey wrote: > > > On Wednesday 19 February 2003 07:10 am, G�tz Waschk wrote: > > >>The freeze doesn't prohibit important bugfixes. While we could argue > > >>about the popularity of xcdroast and xfce, I like the fact that > > >>Mandrake includes alternatives to the KDE monoculture. > > > > > > For me I'm saddend by this. Thats why I started using mandrake years ago. > > > > And years ago, Mandrake decided to be dekstop agnostic. > > > > > Because it was kde only. I find the multiple desktops a waste of > > > > space. I do > > > > > however use gtk and gnome apps just not the desktop environments. > > > > So, how do you propose saving space if you require most of gnome (except > > nautilus and gnome-desktop) to run Evo and Galeon (just examples)? > > Lol thats funny. I use only gaim and xchat. The rest is of no use to me. I do > understand why mandrake supports all of them and i never say anything untill > I see the general bad reamarks about kde. This is more like just remeber > there are others of us who have to put up with things also but we dont go > arround lamenting about it. > > In my case I just make my own custom mandrake cd's with all the garbage taken > out. it allows me stuff more of the good stuff on the cd's. I wont go into > what I take out since it would start a war of epic proportions about editors, > user interfaces, blah blah this and that. When I get done done however I have > a very clean distro. > Garbage?! Would you mind be a little more respectful for the contributions of others? You are free not to like it, but you don't need to be insulting. This is definitely not the kind of words I want to find in my mailbox, much more offensive than a baby man page. Wow :( -- Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
