On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:41:05PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:47:37AM -0500, Murray J. Root wrote: > > The problem is not a broken KDE that requires patching. It is the > > unnecessary addition of "requirements" that are not really "required". > > This has been a problem in Mandrake for a long time. That is why I > > said to quit beating the horse - the Mandrake team disagrees with > > using "requires" the same way an English speaker uses it and it is > > quite clear that no amount of messages to the list is going to get > > them to change it. So live with the bloat or force nodeps. > > I don't really agree with you Murray. I disagree with some of the > requires we have. But I have successfully gotten some removed. mutt's > require on urlview comes to mind. > > I have found as Buchan points out that it is far more successful to fix > the problem and submit the patch than simply complain about the issue. > If someone really wants to split KDE then someone should take the time > to repackage it split out. Submit the patch and let the debate ensue. > > Constant bellyaching about something people could do something about > serves no purpose in solving the issue.
As I pointed out in my followup to Buchan, this thread started when Quel pointed out that MDK had added a requires loop with the galaxy theme that was unnecessary. No patch was needed as the "requires" was bogus in the first place, just simply undo the patch that added it. Followups even pointed out that while the require was valid in one direction (galaxy requires KDE) it was NOT valid in the opposite direction (KDE does not require galaxy). -- Murray J. Root
