On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 12:51:50AM -0800, Quel Qun wrote: > On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 00:16, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote: > > On 2003-02-21(Fri) 18:35:41 -0500, Maks Orlovich wrote: > > > Skipping the whole modularity problem -- about which I'd rather not comment > > > -- don't we have a pretty horrid dependency loop here? > > > > > > If I got it right: > > > galaxy-kde requires kdelibs and kdebase > > > kdebase requires kdelibs and galaxy-kde > > > kdelibs requires galaxy-kde and through it kdebase > > > > Everybody, please give up insisting on this point. The KDE dependency > > has been argued here for many times in cooker. People come and go, > > argueing over and over on this topic, without achieving anything. If the > > time is spent on doing other things, cooker could have become a little > > better. So please spend your energy on something you CAN do, and kill > > this thread. Is it OK for everybody? > > > No, I don't have the room for kdebase. It's too much wasted space.
You're beating a dead horse. These people have no clue what "requires" means and apply it to whatever whim they have the day they make a package. Let it drop - you can't win against people who won't read your messages. -- Murray J. Root
