-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> But I still think that the current Cooker system is actually useful. I have > a Cooker-based workstation that's stable enough to rely on for all of my > daily work. I have a server that I wouldn't put even a "stable Cooker" > release on. I don't really have much need for something in between. I think the nice thing about a middle ground is that it serves to prevent buggy stuff from getting mixed in with an almost stable release. By the time stuff is able to get into "testing" you really don't have many showstoppers or major annoyances. Really to a point, this style of development guarantees that the distribution in testing is "almost ready" for release whenever you need it to be. It also allows unstable stuff to continue to be integrated even while you are preparing a release. I think the existing Cooker works well, but that might be something worth considering in the future. > According to the headers, you're using kmail 1.5, which I don't remember > being the version in 9.0. If you're already using Cooker for your daily > email use, doesn't that say something? (And if I'm wrong, please feel free > to call me an idiot....) Actually, I am running 9.0, although I do have a cooker partition. This install is 9.0 running a late december cooker kernel (since I needed a newer kernel to use DMA with my motherboard) and KDE 3.1 RC5 (call me lazy... I haven't bothered upgrading since final came out). -Tim - -- - ---------------------------------------------------------------- Timothy R. Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Universal Networks http://www.uninet.info Christian Portal and Search Tool: http://www.faithtree.com Enterprise Open Source Journal: http://www.ofb.biz ================================================================ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+aCc6K37Cns9gJ0gRArTAAJ9EJk0uHBspMyuGXmv+aC3J3r6ykQCbBrrP nGh3/KQv46lWwV1oHanbOK0= =vV0x -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
