On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Andi Payn wrote: > A compromise might be to do a QA'd sub-release of Cooker every two months, > rather than every six months. A single team can work on a project with > release dates this short, spending a couple of weeks in freeze every two > months. I think most Cooker users would put up with these freezes in exchange > for an even-more-usable Cooker. And, more importantly, both Mandrake's team > and the user community would have more experience getting together a solid > release; it would require less work to tie together two months' worth of > development than six; and there'd be a solid way to back-track any subset of > the distro, if necessary, without going all the way back to the last major > release.
I would say that it should be made monthly, without formally freezing Cooker per se (ie a fork 10 days before). As release time approaches, the target final version would be based on which one of those snapshots seemed to be the most stable (and thus on squashing as many bugs as possible in that snapshot). Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
