In message
<D1AC4482BED7C04DAC43491E9A9DBEC3901E9E87@BK-EXCHMBX01.blacknight.local>,
at 15:08:24 on Sun, 26 Jan 2014, Michele Neylon - Blacknight
<[email protected]> writes
Registry operators - particularly ccTLDs - do this all the time, but
I don't see many registrants of domains doing it anymore.
What we have to decide for the purposes of this paper is how
often/likely the scenario occurs when the authorities want to block such
a domain. If it is no longer happening, raising the possibility only
confuses the paper. Perhaps they are using other techniques as well,
such as fast flux.
Of course, it's possible that there are numerous small/medium/large
enterprises (be they of criminal intent or otherwise) with multiply-
redundant NS; even if members of the public almost never have the
benefit for their personal websites.
And I thought this paper was about domains more than domain registries?
Yes, which is why the paper should positively avoid the inclusion of
confusing examples such as domains operated by I* entities.
--
Roland Perry
