On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Richard Hill <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for this. > > So, to be clear, the proposal is that RIPE NCC will not prepare a specific > response to the ICG RFP, rather it will delegate to CRISP the task of > preparing a draft response. > Same with the AFRINIC region and i think will applies to other RIRs > > The draft prepared by CRISP will be posted to this mailing list for > discussion and comments. > > Is that correct? > > This is also how i understood it. However i would expect that mailing list to be the NRO list which is more global. Although noting prevents cross-posting. > If yes, then I would propose that RIPE NCC request CRISP to take into > account, when preparing the draft response, all the comments that have been > posted to date to this mailing list. > > Well if you ask me i did say that no major specific discussion/proposal has really happened ;) also it can be unrealistic to task a team yet to be formed to look at previous comments. While they may do that, i think when the team get formed, the 2 RIPE members should find a way of collecting comments from its region as same will be done in other regions as well. Cheers! > Thanks and best, > Richard > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Buckridge [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: mercredi, 22. octobre 2014 09:40 > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: Hans Petter Holen; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] Request for clarification of the process > > > > > > Dear Richard, all, > > > > Attempting a more specific answer to that question: > > > > According to the existing proposal [which should not be regarded > > as final], the RIPE community will not prepare a specific > > response to the Request for Proposals (RFP) produced by the IANA > > Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG). > > > > [The RFP text is available at: > > https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rfp-iana-stewardship-0 > > 8sep14-en.pdf] > > > > The current "draft proposal" takes the approach of a higher-level > > RIPE community position, specifying the mechanism that the > > community wishes to see replace the existing NTIA agreement. The > > current APNIC community draft proposal is based on a similar approach. > > > > To avoid confusion, it may make more sense to refer to this > > document as a draft set of principles, but it is anticipated that > > this text will be the output of the RIPE community discussion. > > > > The ICG RFP lays out a very specific template for the proposals > > that the ICG expects to receive, and the CRISP team can be > > expected to produce a proposal based on this template. There is > > no requirement that the individual RIR communities use this > > template, and consolidating five lengthy, detailed proposals (as > > the RFP template would produce) may pose more of a challenge for > > the CRISP team than drawing together five expressions of > > priorities and preferred mechanisms to develop a single proposal, > > based on the RFP template. > > > > As always, all of the assumptions here are open for discussion in > > this working group. > > > > Best regards, > > Chris > > > > > > On 22 Oct 2014, at 16:31, Richard Hill <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Dear Hans Petter, > > > > > > Thank you for this, it is helpful. > > > > > > But the links you provide refer to the NRO process, whereas my > > question was specifically about the RIPE NCC process. That is, > > what process will RIPE NCC use to prepare its input to CRISP. > > > > > > Thanks again and best, > > > Richard > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Hans Petter Holen > > Sent: mercredi, 22. octobre 2014 01:42 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] Request for clarification of the process > > > > On 20.10.14 21:37, Richard Hill wrote: > >> So my question is actually "What process will be used by RIPE to prepare > a > >> response to the ICG's RFP? Will that response be drafted by the RIPE > NCC > >> staff? And will it be posted to this list for comment before it is > >> submitted to CRIP?" > >> > > I think some of the answer may be found in > > > > https://www.nro.net/news/iana-stewardship-consolidated-rir-iana-stewardship- > proposal-team > > > > and on > > > > > > https://www.nro.net/nro-and-internet-governance/iana-oversight/consolidated- > rir-iana-stewardship-proposal-team-crisp-team > > > > It does say community members and staff - so I do not read that only > staff > will be involved. > > > > I also read that the work will be done on a public mailing-list and that > the meetings will be open. > > > > > > -- > > Hans Petter Holen > > Mobile +47 45 06 60 54 | > > [email protected] | http://hph.oslo.net > > > > > > > > > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>[email protected] <[email protected]>* The key to understanding is humility - my view !
