Gerat ideas. I am all for pooling our ideas, material, and experiences.

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Mark Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> that's right, they're great. i've come across their initiative
> http://www.oercommons.org/ a number of times.
>
> dunno about a facebook group, but probably :-).
>
> seems like a good approach might be to develop the material locally to a
> basic standard of quality (ie on our own wiki) and then release/copy/link it
> to other networks and repositories, tracking and updating improvements and
> developments as their made?
>
> though i still really like the idea of this list/network and the CoCo site
> being available as a resource for those interested in giving and developing
> such material. and of course as a nexus and hub for Cooperation Studies
> ;-)...
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 2:15 PM, J Margolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Great idea!
>> Another place to "house" this might be ISKME.org?
>> And you know, is there a Facebook group....?
>> -J
>>
>> Jessica Margolin
>> voice: +1 510 709 8267
>> fax: +1 866 438 4209
>>
>> Solvation: http://kitode.typepad.com
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Mark Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>
>>> Welcome Suzan, and welcome back to posting Andrea and Matt! Sometimes I
>>> feel like our assumptions about what constitutes 'participation' can put up
>>> barriers (sometimes i've unnecessarily dropped off a project all together
>>> simply because i felt bad that i couldn't give '100%'!). In my experience,
>>> contributing when you can (even when years separate instances) and yes, even
>>> lurking are valuable modes of contribution. As Howard and others have
>>> discussed, collective action is all about ad hoc, voluntary contribution -
>>> which means, what you can, when you can, how you can. So to all of you out
>>> there reading but feeling unable to post or contribute in other ways at this
>>> point - happy to have you! :-D
>>>
>>> There is a lot of great suggestions being made here, and a lot of
>>> opportunities and resources it seems as well.
>>>
>>> Here's an idea I'd like to float - what if we started by creating an
>>> online cooperation studies resource centre which at first could be comprised
>>> of course material already developed - e.g. Howard & Andrea's and Suzan's
>>> (if possible) - and then built upon. These courses could be open to anyone
>>> or any institution to draw upon, so we wouldn't necessarily have to know
>>> where they fit best from the outset - we could just develop materials and
>>> provide support for those who want to teach it, ideally in exchange for
>>> being able to then share and rework the outcome.
>>>
>>> Of course the obvious choice would be to host them at
>>> CooperationCommons.com, however i think a lot of synergy might be available
>>> in somehow connecting with http://en.wikiversity.org (the energy and
>>> enthusiasm of the WP community being obvious). I've had discussions with
>>> some of those folks revolving around an article 
>>> drafted<http://collaboration.wikia.com/wiki/Wikiversity>on a site i started
>>> http://metacollab.net and I'd think there'd be a lot of resonances with
>>> CoCo and our interests/objectives.
>>>
>>> thoughts?..
>>> mark
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Howard Rheingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Matthew,
>>>>
>>>> This might be helpful, as well:
>>>> http://socialmediaclassroom.com/vircom08/freelinking/Collective%2520action
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Howard Rheingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://twitter.com/hrheingold
>>>> http://www.rheingold.com  http://www.smartmobs.com
>>>> http://vlog.rheingold.com
>>>> what it is ---> is --->up to us
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 24, 2008, at 7:00 AM, Matthew Cooperrider wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > Robert wrote:
>>>> >> D'ya suppose aiming at specialty graduate work might actually be a
>>>> >> better target field for planting these seeds than trying to whip up
>>>> >> an
>>>> >> undergrad curriculum?
>>>> >
>>>> > Definitely much easier.  I don't have any argument as to why, but it
>>>> > seems so.
>>>> >
>>>> > And since there has been some re-introduction on this thread...
>>>> >
>>>> > I arrived here maybe a couple years back, and have had a number of
>>>> > short bursts of high involvement, including one burst earlier this
>>>> > summer.  I noticed a lot of activity recently, and I realized that I
>>>> > had left the dinner table yet again without first excusing myself.
>>>> > Sorry :(
>>>> >
>>>> > I probably won't be back until October (post-OneWebDay), but will do
>>>> > my best to stay up-to-date on CoCo progress.  I'm currently a grad
>>>> > student at NYU, and know a few academics in New York City that might
>>>> > be interested in curriculum such as this.
>>>> >
>>>> > Suzan, I'll be the teaching assistant in a freshman Computer Science
>>>> > course called "Computers and Society" this fall.  I have the
>>>> > opportunity to give one or more of the lectures, and I was planning to
>>>> > talk about Cooperation Studies.  I'd love to take a look at your
>>>> > work.  Sounds like a perfect fit!  I of course welcome advice and
>>>> > ideas from anyone else on this as well.
>>>> >
>>>> > MC
>>>> > >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -----
>>> Mark Elliott, PhD
>>> Director, CollabForge pty ltd
>>> collaboration ~ mass collaboration ~ social software
>>>  http://collabforge.com ~ http://mark-elliott.net/ ~
>>> http://metacollab.net/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -----
> Mark Elliott, PhD
> Director, CollabForge pty ltd
> collaboration ~ mass collaboration ~ social software
> http://collabforge.com ~ http://mark-elliott.net/ ~ http://metacollab.net/
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CooperationCommons" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/CooperationCommons?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to