Pressed for time a bit now, but will come back to this on monday. Let's say there are 2 things here:
1. reviving and continuing the basic research of CoCo (I will go in depth into the history of this more on monday) which P2P and FF have a direct interest in, and OK could also have an interest in if it is clarified more (p2p research group too for that matter) 2. Many potential new ways the P2P, FF, OK, CoCo and probably others could extend the work that CoCo has been doing, beyond just summarizing research which we should explore in depth in the ways that Suresh suggests for the very valid reasons Suresh is putting forwards. This could be an ongoing process, and deserves some exploration. I'd be interested to know what you might have in mind, Suresh. Will definitely return to it on Monday. On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Suresh Fernando <[email protected]> wrote: > See below... > > 1. Thinking about whether this kind of research summary activity is > beneficial for OK to contribute to > > In principle, there's no reason why contributing to a research base wouldn't > be useful for OK. The more important question is: what is the purpose of the > research? OK, as you obviously know, is both a recently created entity as > well as a highly fluid one where the scope for what the group does is > largely dependent upon projects that people want to drive. > > That said, what OK is not is purely an information space or a community. OK > is interested in driving projects and therefore information must have > functional utility. > > The mere fact that we are having this conversation about how to > revive/restructure CoCo should make it evident that, in this space, > information for its own sake should not be the primary objective. > > 2. Think about perhaps some other way that OK can contribute to either > the domains covered at http://cooperationcommons.com/summaries or > suggest some new domains, and/or also new ways to contribute beyond > summarizing existing citeable works (maybe OK has some real-world data > activity, or other related activity that can help build useful > knowledge around cooperation studies? Maybe OK ends up contributing to > a related practical knowledge base of how to apply the knowledge, that > links to and cites the existing and future CoCo, P2P found, and FF > research (and maybe Metacollab while we're at it? This could also be > something that FF would contribute > > Although OK is not, primarily, a research group, we obviously rely on > information both about activity in the world around collaboration, open > collaboration and the like as well as research on these topics. We could > certainly contribute to existing knowledge bases or form new ones that are > focused on this topic area. > > > So, those are some suggestions for OK, which admittedly might at first > blush be more difficult to map into CoCo activity in a many-to-many, > federated/collab way. It's mostly thinking about how OK work might map > to existing and future CoCo work, and I think there are some plausible > connections there. > > In order to better understand how OK and CoCo work can be aligned, it would > be great to have a clearer sense of what 'existing and future CoCo work' > will amount to. > > In the spirit of collaboration and the fact that we are rethinking CoCo > governance, have opened up discussions between the FF, P2P and OK etc., I > think the best strategy would be to think about what the collective assets > and focus of all of the groups that are party to the discussion are, figure > out what the best way for us to collaborate is, and determine what the most > appropriate governance structure is. > > The governance mechanisms of any of the groups that are a part of the > conversation need not change. The question, as I mentioned before, is how to > develop governance mechanisms, information exchange and workflow processes > that make open collaboration across groups such as this possible. > > If we are able to solve that problem, many interesting things become > possible ;-) > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Samuel Rose <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I have an agreement from Howard, and Michel on what is listed at >> http://holocene.cc/wagn/Cooperation_Commons_Network_Cogovernance_Proposal >> >> I think most of the points Suresh makes are good. I believe my >> proposal addresses the points Suresh makes below. All CoCo content >> would possess a license (to be determined with Howard) and would exist >> in an archive maintained by Forward Foundation, and also replicable in >> a synchronized way with partners (p2p foundation, OK if OK is >> interested). Partners co-govern the content going forward using a >> specific named agreement (constitution) and process (consensus poll). >> New additions carry metadata that they are contributions to CoCo >> archive, and also carry attribution of contributor organization or >> project. >> >> This helps to carry forward the original mission of CoCo >> summary/research content. >> >> Then, once that is accompished, I think those who are interested in >> partnering on carrying forward the specific CoCo project/research >> should begin to think about how to map workflows to future >> contributions (which should be easy enough for P2P foundation, and >> Forward Foundation). If OK does not currently have any activity that >> represents the research and analysis. Then, OK could explore: >> >> 1. Thinking about whether this kind of research summary activity is >> beneficial for OK to contribute to >> >> 2. Think about perhaps some other way that OK can contribute to either >> the domains covered at http://cooperationcommons.com/summaries or >> suggest some new domains, and/or also new ways to contribute beyond >> summarizing existing citeable works (maybe OK has some real-world data >> activity, or other related activity that can help build useful >> knowledge around cooperation studies? Maybe OK ends up contributing to >> a related practical knowledge base of how to apply the knowledge, that >> links to and cites the existing and future CoCo, P2P found, and FF >> research (and maybe Metacollab while we're at it? This could also be >> something that FF would contribute >> >> >> So, those are some suggestions for OK, which admittedly might at first >> blush be more difficult to map into CoCo activity in a many-to-many, >> federated/collab way. It's mostly thinking about how OK work might map >> to existing and future CoCo work, and I think there are some plausible >> connections there. >> >> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Suresh Fernando >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > The larger objective (as I see it) with this sort of mechanism is to >> > define >> > specific workflows that can serve to connect the various groups that >> > have >> > missions that are connected at a high level but that are working >> > independently in a manner that allows the groups to retain their >> > autonomy. >> > >> > Specifically, OK, CoCo, Forward Foundation and the P2P Foundation are >> > working, at least in some sense, towards figuring out how to utilize the >> > principles of web 2.0, P2P architecture, open collaboration, networks >> > etc >> > for social benefit. >> > >> > The operational challenge, therefore, is to ensure that we work together >> > collaboratively without the unrealistic assumption that we will merge >> > our >> > own projects into the projects of others. We all have a vested interest >> > in >> > the maintenance of what we have built and are continuing to build. >> > >> > Hence there is an inherent tension between the larger collective >> > objectives >> > and our self interest in maintaining our own brands. >> > >> > The key is to recognize and embrace this, not to see it as a flaw, a >> > failure >> > of collaboration or something like that. >> > >> > One way to do this this is, as Sam has suggested, jointly connect >> > content >> > across various platforms. For example, ensure that all collaboration >> > related >> > content from OK is posted to CoCo and vice versa. All P2P related >> > content >> > flows back and forth from the P2P website.... >> > >> > This way, we leverage and reuse the work that we are all doing >> > independently >> > and yet retain the autonomy of the various groups. >> > >> > I think this is a necessary step if we are to get groups such as the >> > ones >> > represented in this discussion more closely aligned. >> > >> > Thoughts? >> > >> > Suresh >> > >> > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Michel Bauwens <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> sounds very sensible, I will follow you on this Sam, >> >> >> >> Michel >> >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Howard Rheingold >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> I like. >> >>> >> >>> Howard Rheingold [email protected] http://twitter.com/hrheingold >> >>> http://www.rheingold.com http://www.smartmobs.com >> >>> http://vlog.rheingold.com >> >>> what it is ---> is --->up to us >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Dec 5, 2009, at 4:08 AM, Samuel Rose wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> If Forward Foundation creates a method for distribution, then we >> >>>> could >> >>>> partner with Michel, and P2P foundation, as well as potentially >> >>>> others >> >>>> interested, in the co-governance of the project as it lives in >> >>>> multiple places, but is archived in a uniform/open archive method. >> >>>> >> >>>> Forward Foundation would be glad to take the ownership and >> >>>> responsibility. Both Paul and myself helped work on the site code, >> >>>> the >> >>>> summaries, and the blogging/community/etc and we're both very >> >>>> intimately familiar with the content within. We are also both >> >>>> familiar >> >>>> with many of the people in the community that emerged around CoCo. FF >> >>>> is working now on contributing more to the pool of research for CoCo >> >>>> as part of regular Forward Found activities. >> >>>> >> >>>> Further growth will likely depend on multiple people, rather than >> >>>> just >> >>>> one person. I think that OK, P2P foundation, and FF could all easily >> >>>> partner and collaborate on co-governance of the project, on helping >> >>>> to >> >>>> grow and promote, and on growing it in distributed ways. >> >>>> >> >>>> I propose a networked partnership between our groups, assuming all >> >>>> are >> >>>> interested, in carrying out the co-governance, promoting, growing, >> >>>> and >> >>>> creating a way to distribute the content. >> >>>> >> >>>> So, this means that it could live on P2P wiki, OK wiki, and FF, plus >> >>>> a >> >>>> revised version of the site itself, which now aggregates from those 3 >> >>>> wikis, when a category is placed on a new summary, or when it is >> >>>> changed to type "Publish CoCo" in OK and FF, and all could be synced >> >>>> with an archive which itself is output in a standard archiving >> >>>> format. >> >>>> Co-governance could be handled by way of timed consensus polling of >> >>>> partner groups (we could establish a simple constitution first) <-- >> >>>> Howard could be involved in as much or little of this as he wishes. >> >>>> >> >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Consensus_polling >> >>>> >> >>>> Furthermore, both P2P foundation in europe, and FF in US could seek >> >>>> funding or donation for the ongoing maint. of CoCo and it's archives, >> >>>> and the added value from distributing it and making it available in >> >>>> multiple formats. >> >>>> >> >>>> What do you think? >> >>>> >> >>>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Michel Bauwens >> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> wherever it will be located, further growth will be dependent on >> >>>>> someone >> >>>>> taking ownwership/responsibiltiy of the project, and motivating >> >>>>> others >> >>>>> .. >> >>>>> just placing it with a general request won't lead to much further >> >>>>> growth I >> >>>>> think, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> is there such a person? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Michel >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Howard Rheingold >> >>>>> <[email protected]> >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> My original hope was that many people would build on our summaries >> >>>>>> and >> >>>>>> that the original summaries would serve as models of the level of >> >>>>>> quality >> >>>>>> we'd like to see. So, yes! >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Howard Rheingold [email protected] http://twitter.com/hrheingold >> >>>>>> http://www.rheingold.com http://www.smartmobs.com >> >>>>>> http://vlog.rheingold.com >> >>>>>> what it is ---> is --->up to us >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Dec 4, 2009, at 10:36 AM, Samuel Rose wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Could also be interesting to see people contributing summaries at >> >>>>>>> p2p >> >>>>>>> found, and we will be doing similar summaries as forward >> >>>>>>> foundation, >> >>>>>>> and also making those public as well. So, we as forward foundation >> >>>>>>> could make an archive from many participants who are contributing, >> >>>>>>> and >> >>>>>>> also give them a way to import contributions from the network. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> What do you think about that? >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Howard Rheingold >> >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Thank you for your kind offer, Michel. It isn't in danger of >> >>>>>>>> disappearing, >> >>>>>>>> but I've been paying for the server for years now, and I have >> >>>>>>>> half a >> >>>>>>>> dozen >> >>>>>>>> such subscriptions, so I am thinking of handing it off to a more >> >>>>>>>> permanent >> >>>>>>>> home that won't depend on me renewing the hosting subscription >> >>>>>>>> every >> >>>>>>>> year. I >> >>>>>>>> like the idea of exportable local copies with embedded >> >>>>>>>> attribution. >> >>>>>>>> We >> >>>>>>>> should probably put a cc license on it right away. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> There is no urgency. If Stanford doesn't step up, let's look at >> >>>>>>>> moving >> >>>>>>>> it to >> >>>>>>>> Sam's or your server. I was interested in the alliance with the >> >>>>>>>> Persuasive >> >>>>>>>> Technology Lab because maybe they could recruit students to add >> >>>>>>>> summaries >> >>>>>>>> and blog posts. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Howard Rheingold [email protected] >> >>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/hrheingold >> >>>>>>>> http://www.rheingold.com http://www.smartmobs.com >> >>>>>>>> http://vlog.rheingold.com >> >>>>>>>> what it is ---> is --->up to us >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On Dec 4, 2009, at 3:57 AM, Samuel Rose wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> I don't think there is a danger of losing the actual content, as >> >>>>>>>>> there >> >>>>>>>>> are many places the site/db can be hosted. Although, it could be >> >>>>>>>>> useful for people to have an exportable local copy (think about >> >>>>>>>>> things >> >>>>>>>>> like p2pwiki, http://thewikireader.com/ etc etc) so eventually >> >>>>>>>>> we >> >>>>>>>>> could make it possible for people to import into their >> >>>>>>>>> mediawikis, >> >>>>>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>>> other places, with embedded attribution if Howard agrees. (There >> >>>>>>>>> is >> >>>>>>>>> no >> >>>>>>>>> declared license on the content on the site). >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Michel Bauwens >> >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Sam, >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> you ask how we can strengthen CoCo ... just a general >> >>>>>>>>>> statement, I >> >>>>>>>>>> am >> >>>>>>>>>> swamped myself, any cooperation is welcome as long as it aligns >> >>>>>>>>>> with >> >>>>>>>>>> what >> >>>>>>>>>> I'm already doing for p2p-f ... I have a question about the >> >>>>>>>>>> archive of >> >>>>>>>>>> CoCo, >> >>>>>>>>>> which had done so much serious work around the cooperation >> >>>>>>>>>> literature. >> >>>>>>>>>> Depending on howard's and the coco community wishes, if there >> >>>>>>>>>> is a >> >>>>>>>>>> danger >> >>>>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>>> it disappearing, then certainly, I would be very open to >> >>>>>>>>>> incorporate >> >>>>>>>>>> as a >> >>>>>>>>>> project on the p2p-f wiki. It seems there is a natural fit, >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Michel >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Howard, there could be some useful connections for whatever >> >>>>>>>>>>> CoCo >> >>>>>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>>>>> the way that Open Kollab, P2P Foundation, and Forward >> >>>>>>>>>>> Foundation >> >>>>>>>>>>> are >> >>>>>>>>>>> starting to collaborate in effective ways. At least, in terms >> >>>>>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>>>> ongoing research, maintaining of open knowledge bases, etc. >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> We are refining and improving weekly the way that we all work >> >>>>>>>>>>> together. It would be really awesome to figure out how to >> >>>>>>>>>>> efficiently >> >>>>>>>>>>> and usefully integrate CoCo into this emerging ecology. >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Many of us met in CoCo list, and we are now really seriously >> >>>>>>>>>>> digging >> >>>>>>>>>>> into some worthwhile projects and collaborations, and >> >>>>>>>>>>> synthesizing of >> >>>>>>>>>>> workflows. So, I agree with Matt that CoCo as project or >> >>>>>>>>>>> community is >> >>>>>>>>>>> definitely missed here. >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> c> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Matt Cooperrider >> >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> just thinking about CoCo after Marc Dangeard's recent post >> >>>>>>>>>>>> there. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Howard >> >>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned he's got a new partnership/funding opportunity to >> >>>>>>>>>>>> reboot >> >>>>>>>>>>>> coco. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Since CoCo is very research-focused, it seems complementary >> >>>>>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>>>>> OK. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> maybe >> >>>>>>>>>>>> we >> >>>>>>>>>>>> should get Howard on a call just to trade ideas? >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> also, as I type this, i realize that marc dangeard's work >> >>>>>>>>>>>> with >> >>>>>>>>>>>> entrepreneur >> >>>>>>>>>>>> commons - http://entrepreneurcommons.googlepages.com/ - is >> >>>>>>>>>>>> right >> >>>>>>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>>>>>> line >> >>>>>>>>>>>> with the OKfund >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> any thoughts? mybe we can talk about this tomorrow >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Cooperrider, Consultant >> >>>>>>>>>>>> BLOG: http://mattcoop.com >> >>>>>>>>>>>> SITE: http://collabforge.com >> >>>>>>>>>>>> TWITTER: @mattcoop >> >>>>>>>>>>>> PHONE: 774.487.8152 >> >>>>>>>>>>>> M.O.: http://notanemployee.net/ >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>>>>>> Sam Rose >> >>>>>>>>>>> Social Synergy >> >>>>>>>>>>> Tel:+1(517) 639-1552 >> >>>>>>>>>>> Cel: +1-(517)-974-6451 >> >>>>>>>>>>> skype: samuelrose >> >>>>>>>>>>> email: [email protected] >> >>>>>>>>>>> http://socialsynergyweb.com >> >>>>>>>>>>> http://forwardfound.org >> >>>>>>>>>>> http://socialsynergyweb.org/culturing >> >>>>>>>>>>> http://flowsbook.panarchy.com/ >> >>>>>>>>>>> http://socialmediaclassroom.com >> >>>>>>>>>>> http://localfoodsystems.org >> >>>>>>>>>>> http://notanemployee.net >> >>>>>>>>>>> http://communitywiki.org >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> "The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with >> >>>>>>>>>>> human >> >>>>>>>>>>> ambition." - Carl Sagan >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>>>>> Work: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhurakij_Pundit_University - >> >>>>>>>>>> Research: >> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.dpu.ac.th/dpuic/info/Research.html - Think thank: >> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - >> >>>>>>>>>> http://blog.p2pfoundation.net >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; >> >>>>>>>>>> http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; >> >>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>>>> Sam Rose >> >>>>>>>>> Social Synergy >> >>>>>>>>> Tel:+1(517) 639-1552 >> >>>>>>>>> Cel: +1-(517)-974-6451 >> >>>>>>>>> skype: samuelrose >> >>>>>>>>> email: [email protected] >> >>>>>>>>> http://socialsynergyweb.com >> >>>>>>>>> http://forwardfound.org >> >>>>>>>>> http://socialsynergyweb.org/culturing >> >>>>>>>>> http://flowsbook.panarchy.com/ >> >>>>>>>>> http://socialmediaclassroom.com >> >>>>>>>>> http://localfoodsystems.org >> >>>>>>>>> http://notanemployee.net >> >>>>>>>>> http://communitywiki.org >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> "The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with >> >>>>>>>>> human >> >>>>>>>>> ambition." - Carl Sagan >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>> Sam Rose >> >>>>>>> Social Synergy >> >>>>>>> Tel:+1(517) 639-1552 >> >>>>>>> Cel: +1-(517)-974-6451 >> >>>>>>> skype: samuelrose >> >>>>>>> email: [email protected] >> >>>>>>> http://socialsynergyweb.com >> >>>>>>> http://forwardfound.org >> >>>>>>> http://socialsynergyweb.org/culturing >> >>>>>>> http://flowsbook.panarchy.com/ >> >>>>>>> http://socialmediaclassroom.com >> >>>>>>> http://localfoodsystems.org >> >>>>>>> http://notanemployee.net >> >>>>>>> http://communitywiki.org >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> "The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human >> >>>>>>> ambition." - Carl Sagan >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> Work: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhurakij_Pundit_University - >> >>>>> Research: >> >>>>> http://www.dpu.ac.th/dpuic/info/Research.html - Think thank: >> >>>>> http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI >> >>>>> >> >>>>> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - >> >>>>> http://blog.p2pfoundation.net >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; >> >>>>> http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; >> >>>>> http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> -- >> >>>> Sam Rose >> >>>> Social Synergy >> >>>> Tel:+1(517) 639-1552 >> >>>> Cel: +1-(517)-974-6451 >> >>>> skype: samuelrose >> >>>> email: [email protected] >> >>>> http://socialsynergyweb.com >> >>>> http://forwardfound.org >> >>>> http://socialsynergyweb.org/culturing >> >>>> http://flowsbook.panarchy.com/ >> >>>> http://socialmediaclassroom.com >> >>>> http://localfoodsystems.org >> >>>> http://notanemployee.net >> >>>> http://communitywiki.org >> >>>> >> >>>> "The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human >> >>>> ambition." - Carl Sagan >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Work: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhurakij_Pundit_University - >> >> Research: >> >> http://www.dpu.ac.th/dpuic/info/Research.html - Think thank: >> >> http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI >> >> >> >> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - >> >> http://blog.p2pfoundation.net >> >> >> >> Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: >> >> http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org >> >> >> >> Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; >> >> http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Suresh Fernando >> > WEBSITE: http://radical-inclusion.com >> > WEBSITE: http://wiki.openkollab.com >> > BLOG: http://sureshfernando.wordpress.com >> > TWITTER: http://twitter.com/sureshf >> > FACEBOOK: facebook.com/suresh.fernando >> > 604-889-8167 >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> Sam Rose >> Social Synergy >> Tel:+1(517) 639-1552 >> Cel: +1-(517)-974-6451 >> skype: samuelrose >> email: [email protected] >> http://socialsynergyweb.com >> http://forwardfound.org >> http://socialsynergyweb.org/culturing >> http://flowsbook.panarchy.com/ >> http://socialmediaclassroom.com >> http://localfoodsystems.org >> http://notanemployee.net >> http://communitywiki.org >> >> "The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human >> ambition." - Carl Sagan > > > > -- > Suresh Fernando > WEBSITE: http://radical-inclusion.com > WEBSITE: http://wiki.openkollab.com > BLOG: http://sureshfernando.wordpress.com > TWITTER: http://twitter.com/sureshf > FACEBOOK: facebook.com/suresh.fernando > 604-889-8167 > -- -- Sam Rose Social Synergy Tel:+1(517) 639-1552 Cel: +1-(517)-974-6451 skype: samuelrose email: [email protected] http://socialsynergyweb.com http://forwardfound.org http://socialsynergyweb.org/culturing http://flowsbook.panarchy.com/ http://socialmediaclassroom.com http://localfoodsystems.org http://notanemployee.net http://communitywiki.org "The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human ambition." - Carl Sagan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CooperationCommons" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cooperationcommons?hl=en.
