On Fri, 6 Mar 2015, Andy Howard wrote:

I'm refining a structure of a protein for which the crystallization conditions include Na/K tartrate. The "Modeling -> Add Other Solvent Molecules -> Add a new residue" menu in Coot recognized TAR as being tartaric acid, so I used it to build this molecule. But this is a high-resolution structure wherein I can discern the actual stereochemistry of this molecule, and it's clearly not the one that the code is building: the code is building (2R,3S)-dihydroxybutanedioic acid, i.e. meso-tartaric acid, whereas the true solvent is the natural, (R,R)-tartaric acid. The label within Coot says it's building (2S,3S), but I don't think that's actually what's being coded for. I was able to manually move the incorrect hydroxyl by "Rotate/Translate Zone", but of course Coot then complains that there's an incorrect chiral volume. A related peculiarity is that when I invoke the "Add other solvent molecules" menu, it sometimes labels this compound as TARTARIC ACID, and other times as "2,3-dihydroxybutanedioc acid". When it labels it as TARTARIC ACID, it knows what chi angles are available; when it labels it as "2,3-dihydroxybutanedioc acid", the "Edit Chi Angles" functionality fails. I'm not an organic chemist, and I don't play one on television. Any thoughts from the community?


Andy,

I do not know anything about adding solvent molecules in coot but thought that it might be useful to get some information about the different structural isomers of tartaric acid in the PDB chemical components definitions (so that if/when you deposit the structure you will be using the correct 3 letter code).

Searching Ligand expo http://ligand-expo.rcsb.org
for "Molecular name (similar)" yields the results that there are versions
of tartaric acid in the chemical components:

+=====+=======================================+
| PDB |   Name/
|  ID |   Synonyms
+=====+=======================================+
| TAR | d(-)-tartaric acid | | (2s,3s)-2,3-dihydroxybutanedioic acid
+=====+=======================================+
| TLA | l(+)-tartaric acid
|     | (2r,3r)-2,3-dihydroxybutanedioic acid
+=====+=======================================+
| SRT | s,r meso-tartaric acid
|     | (2r,3s)-2,3-dihydroxybutanedioic acid
|     | (2s,3r)-2,3-dihydroxybutanedioic acid
+=====+=======================================+

Using http://www.rcsb.org/ additional information
TAR is found in 93 PDB entries
TLA is found in 275 PDB entries
SRT is found in 49 PDB entries

You can buy all three forms from Sigma Aldrich

So it sounds to me that you want to build your
tartaric acid(s) as TLA?

In case it helps I generated a dictionary for TLA on the Grade Web Server:

http://grade.globalphasing.org/cgi-bin/grade/server.cgi?runid=14257499237feLtSSYKZB

The cif dictionary should work with coot (and refmac). (But you might prefer to use ccp4 dictionary and tools).

Good luck

Oliver

------------------
Dr Oliver Smart
Director SmartSci Limited
http://www.smartsci.uk/
& Consultant Global Phasing Ltd
http://www.globalphasing.com/

Reply via email to