Hi,

On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 02:04:02PM -0700, Dale Tronrud wrote:
>    What people almost universally do is simply calculate the rms value of
> the map which is an rms deviation assuming the the "true value" is zero.

Out of interest: I understand the computation of "the" rms value for a
crystallographic map covering a multiple of the asymmetric unit -
which is standardising this computation to a large extent. But how
does one do this with EM maps? The map is in some kind of arbitrary
box and could be masked/non-masked ... so a rms value adequate for
visualising one map could be completely different for another map just
because of those technicalities, right?

I don't even pretend to understand the scale of those maps or any
other procedure that resulting in them, but is htere any standard
procedure that allows users to come up with a "typical" rms value that
would allow some kind of equal footling comparison between e..g
deposited EM maps? The rms level at which the lowest B TRP/PHE/TYR
shows a hole (just to pick "something" probably rather silly)?

Any pointer for my education about Cryo-EM SOPs would be highly
appreciated!

Cheers

Clemens

PS: we have the same problem in MX when dealing with deposited
    non-crystallographic maps (like event maps in an abritrary P1 cell
    with some padding around a masked density) ... as soon as we don't
    have a defined standard volume (asymmetric unit) using the
    resulting rms becomes an arbitrary choice in itself I guess.




> While you might be able to convince yourself that the rms value of a Fo-Fc
> map is related to its "error level" (although don't say that in the presence
> of James Holton!) no on can argue that the rms value of a density (or
> potential) map has any relation to the standard deviation of that map.
> 
>    So, Coot labels the quantity an rms.  I, personally, hope that others
> would become honest about their calculation and use that term too.
> 
> Dale Tronrud
> 
> On 7/14/2026 6:45 AM, Morici, Martino wrote:
> > Hi folks
> > 
> > 
> > I am working on a CryoEM map of a ribosome (specifically a 70S .mrc from
> > Relion, looking at both the 3Drefined map focus-refined with a mask on
> > the 30S and the corresponding Relion postprocessed map with the same
> > mask).
> > 
> > My aim is evaluating which parts of a ligand´s density appear at
> > lower/higher threshold.
> > 
> > 
> > In the field, the sigma is used (The ligand is visible at X sigma etc).
> > 
> > Coot shows RMSD while scrolling.
> > 
> > I did some homework and it seems to me that a certain value Y rmsd in
> > Coot is basically equivalent to the corresponding X sigma.
> > 
> > 
> > However, before publishing this and writing it down, I wanted your
> > opinion if effectively X and Y are the same, and if not how to
> > understand their correlation.
> > 
> > 
> > I am asking because I am not sure whether the way I processed these maps
> > may affect the X/Y correlation.
> > 
> > 
> > Thank you so much
> > 
> > - M.
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from the COOT list, click the following link:
> > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=COOT&A=1
> > <https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=COOT&A=1>
> > 
> 
> ########################################################################
> 
> To unsubscribe from the COOT list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=COOT&A=1
> 
> This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/COOT, a mailing list 
> hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

-- 

*--------------------------------------------------------------
* Clemens Vonrhein, Ph.D.     vonrhein AT GlobalPhasing DOT com
* Global Phasing Ltd., 9 Journey Campus, Castle Park 
* Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK                   www.globalphasing.com
*--------------------------------------------------------------

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the COOT list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=COOT&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/COOT, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to